Philosophy Information

Choice and Social Acceptance in Human Organizations


Let's discuss choice and social acceptance. I had the most interesting conversation the other day with a friend at a coffee shop. I was working on a quote and read it out loud and then we discussed it for hours. First here is the quote:

"It is interesting how many groups, religions, teams, military organizations, etc. offer: "Social Acceptance" all in trade for you giving up your ideals, thoughts, personal observations and dreams."

This of course later after the conversation had two qualifiers.

First; You actually have to have formed ideals, thoughts, personal observations and dreams (Many perceive they have formed such, but in reality are brainwashed like the masses through media bombardment and the nurturing within the false land of political correctness. These poor souls have merely convinced themselves that they believe rhetoric which has been purported as fact throughout the history of mankind).

Second; The person must be somewhat similar to the others already in the group in various attributes. (for instance a black person cannot join the KKK, even if he were to agree with there premise and a Jewish person cannot join a NEO-Nazi group. A skinny person cannot join an organization of Line Backers and a Chinese person cannot join the Mayflower Society). This is because mankind in order to form social groups usually picks enemies that in turn bond the group together in a common cause. Such enemies are predetermined by the group and continually change through a gang mentality, which mankind is all to good at promoting when it serves a group they wish to control.

Now then when discussing these observations we had some other thoughts.

With such a set of choices for an enlightened individual, why bother joining any group at all? Why would you join any group that would have you as a member? Which indeed is an excellent question. If you are willing to give up your values, views and observations in trade for joining simply to be socially accepted then perhaps you are unworthy as an individual to give much to the group except numbers which increase the power of the leaders. If most groups amongst the human species are set up in such a fashion it would appear that belonging to no groups is could in fact be a greater noble calling. So then the character of the followers of the most benevolent of organizations may not be noble at all. Giving up one's self seems to be a waste of a very large cranial cavity and potential brain capacity which mankind has available for cognitive reasoning. This is why we say it is "very interesting" how many of these clubs, religions, groups require blind following and even more interesting how many people are willing to deny their own observations, beliefs and dreams to satisfy the innate characteristic need of belonging, social acceptance and respect from their fellow man.

Obviously mankind is a social animal, which means we naturally form groups and work with each other for the benefit of the group. Maslow in his comments would agree that such a need of man is so great that they would follow into a death march, just to belong. Muslim suicide bombers comes to mind. Life itself and the essence of all we are while we are here is in jeopardy is all but wasted when we fail to question authority and blindly follow those who use our human needs against us. We also took into consideration Gangs in inner cities, kids doing drugs from peer pressure, accountants cheating to belong to a company, etc. In about an hour we came up with about 40 examples, which seemed to correspond to most of societies major current issues and problems. In the franchising industry, we believe one should keep the local community atmosphere and local feel, without having to give up their values, dreams, ambitions, self or observations.

It would behoove people to join groups to solve the needs of the human spirit that do not require one to give up their value system, dreams, aspirations, principles, personal belief system based on real observations. Any group of the sort does not serve humankind or its participants and certainly not those who become enemies of the group or are used as something to be against. We as a species ought to get along and understand that the problem is in the way we form social groups. The problem is not the fact that humans do form groups, that is clearly innate and possibly the reason that our branch of upright walking homo sapiens was the one which got this far in the first place. There appears to be some needs out there for us to continue in this tradition so we must think about what we are doing, who we are doing it with, what we have to give up to belong before we give away the greatest gift in trade. Choose both. Choose a group, which fulfills your needs as a human being and a groups or groups, which do not require your giving up your individuality or mind. After all this is a free country, soon to be a free world and we are granted freedom of choice, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of thought and it is worth all we have sacrificed to date. Something to think about. That is all for Coffee Shop Philosophy today. Any ideas along this theme, please post them below.

"Lance Winslow" - If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/wttbbs


MORE RESOURCES:

QB Garcia still wants to play, questions Bucs' philosophy
Tampa Tribune
He is 40 years old, has been out the NFL for one season and would be a gamble for any team who signs him. ...

and more »


Talk of the Town: Run to finish is a good philosophy for life, exercise
Post-Bulletin
When I was a teenager I would never have admitted this, but it's true that growing up in a small town has lots of advantages. Having only 37 kids in your ...

and more »


Muse Concert Bemuses Boston With Showmanship, Philosophy
Trinity Tripod (subscription)
On Saturday, March 6, British alternative rock band Muse stormed the stage of the Boston, Mass., TD Garden and played a set so phenomenal it almost dared ...

and more »


The elimination of Women's History Month in March, 2110
CU Columbia Spectator
This was unheard of at Columbia when my great-grandmother, Yurina Ko, was studying philosophy at Barnard in the 21st century Aughts. ...

and more »


A core Liberal philosophy betrayed
Sydney Morning Herald
He should have gone further and apologised to his party for discarding its fundamental charter and core philosophy. He should have apologised to the spirit ...

and more »


'Why Should We Care?' Discussion on disaster, ethics starts tonight
Grand Forks Herald
The event is the latest in a project, based at the UND Department of Philosophy with professor Jack Weinstein, to encourage philosophical discussion in the ...

and more »


Bizjournals.com (blog)

Pete Carroll's breakfast talk provides words to chew on
Seattle Times (blog)
Once any footage is posted on Seahawks.com, it is worth watching for the insights it provided into his general philosophy and just his demeanor. ...
Pete goes Carroll-ingSeahawks.com

all 4 news articles »


Jacoby Ellsbury in Left Signals Red Sox' Change in Philosophy
NESN.com
From Ted Williams to Carl Yastrzemski to Jim Rice to Mike Greenwell to Manny Ramirez to Jason Bay, left field at ...

and more »


1070 The Fan - Indianapolis

Is Lilja too small to play left guard for Lions?
Detroit Free Press (blog)
“They said they want to go bigger and apparently are going to get people who fit that philosophy,” Craig Domann, Lilja's agent, told the Indianapolis Star. ...
Theories on why Lilja was really cutStampede Blue
Indianapolis Colts Daily Digest: On release of OG Ryan Lilja and future of the ...Examiner.com

all 55 news articles »


hecklerspray

Miley Cyrus Says She's Absolutely Deeper Than You
hecklerspray
Because, come on, if the lyrics to Party In The USA aren't on the same level as, say, Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy: Philosophy as Rigorous ...

and more »

Google News

home | site map
© 2006