Politics Information

Fundamentalist: Fascist or Common-Sense?


Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.

I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.

This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict - while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'

It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say - but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.

Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars - now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.

So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.

Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.


MORE RESOURCES:

Kansas City Star

Jobs and Politics
New York Times
This week, the Obama administration is expected to unveil a plan for jobs, but early word indicates that it will be a political response designed to ...
PM Politics Links: The economy, jobs, sharp elbows, peak oil and an attack on ...Plain Dealer
Put the millionaires' tax money to good useWashington Post
The Obama Summer: Stimulus, Job Loss And Election FeverBayou Buzz

all 1,588 news articles »


Huffington Post (blog)

Get Politics Alerts
Huffington Post (blog)
I'm not a guru of politics. I'm not a pundit of policy debates. I'm not a Beltway lobbyist. My knowledge of politics does not go beyond 101, those classes ...

and more »


Seattle Post Intelligencer

Delaware's O'Donnell: 'Stop Thug Politics'
Wall Street Journal (blog)
A longtime political consultant in the state, O'Donnell was the party's own candidate against former Sen. Joe Biden two years ago. ...
Delaware politics: Castle, O'Donnell duel -- but not on same stageThe News Journal

all 330 news articles »


The Age

There's No Good News for Democrats Because There's No Good News
Huffington Post (blog)
"All politics are local," Tip O'Neill famously said, and the political smoke signals being sent up locally going into the 2010 midterms all point to ...
The Democrats' Biggest MistakeFOXNews
Court ends Tea Party's hopesDetroit Free Press
2010 election stakes: Drawing a lineBaltimore Sun
Rochester Business Journal -Nolan Chart LLC -The AtlanticWire (blog)
all 180 news articles »


Oregon politics: John Kitzhaber and Chris Dudley agree to Sept. 30 debate
Examiner.com
After much negotiation and political posturing, Gubernatorial candidates John Kitzhaber, Democrat, and Chris Dudley, Republican, have agreed to a Sept. ...

and more »


Christian Science Monitor

Your morning fashion and beauty report: Meghan McCain dishes on style ...
Los Angeles Times (blog)
Meghan McCain, daughter of presidential contender John, has a new memoir out about the campaign, "Dirty, Sexy Politics." Though there's not much dirt or sex ...
Review of 'Dirty Sexy Politics,' by Meghan McCainWashington Post
Meghan McCain on New Book 'Dirty Sexy Politics' | O'Reilly FactorFOXNews
Meghan McCain's 'Dirty Sexy Politics': five best linesChristian Science Monitor

all 43 news articles »


msnbc.com

Arizona Politics: You Have Now Entered the Twilight Zone
truthout
After watching Wednesday's Arizona gubernatorial debate, I noticed a comment on my Facebook page opining that if Gov. Jan Brewer wins the election after her ...
Pueblo Politics: Brewer not misquoted on beheadings, despite claimArizona Daily Star (blog)
Pueblo Politics: Brewer puts the kibosh on more debatesArizona Daily Star (blog)
This week in crazy: Jan BrewerSalon
Tucson Citizen -TPI News (blog) -Daily Mail
all 895 news articles »


In DC schools, Rhee and Fenty learn that tough reforms bring tougher politics
Washington Post
Historically, school boards were established in an effort to take the politics out of education governance; the growth of mayoral control over the past two ...

and more »


Hooman Majd on Normal Politics in Iran
Monthly Review
As Hooman rightly points out, "that's little more than wishful thinking dressed up as political analysis." The public disagreements among various factions ...

and more »


Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)

Economics always drives politics; politics seldom drive economics
Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog)
But admitting that fact is political suicide. This morning, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the August jobs report. In essence, it was flat. ...

and more »

Google News

home | site map
© 2006